Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

DoorDash in disputes over arbitration clauses, contractor status

DoorDash, a company based in California, was recently mandated to comply with their own arbitration clause. DoorDash hires thousands of delivery workers as independent contractors to deliver food from an array of restaurants, and requires their contractors to sign a mandatory arbitration clause before working. DoorDash was compelled to comply after the company attempted to avoid multiple claims by its independent contractors. Mandatory arbitration clauses have increasingly become controversial due to numerous reports of tech companies utilizing arbitration clauses to silence sexual harassment and discrimination cases. Among other issues, DoorDash’s clause requires that disputes over whether workers are properly classified as contractors or as employees to be handled through arbitration.

Employees, unlike independent contractors, have access to a greater variety of benefits and protections. Over 6,000 DoorDash workers have filed claims that they had been improperly classified as contractors. However, because of DoorDash’s mandatory arbitration clause, the workers were prevented from launching a class-action lawsuit or other court challenges to their classification. Instead, each of the delivery workers contesting their status had to pay the $300 filing fee to seek an individual arbitration. Ironically, DoorDash failed to meet deadlines or pay its own required $1,900 fee for each arbitration case that were set forth by their own clause.

The company sought to put a hold on the arbitration cases, because a separate California court case regarding a dispute between DoorDash and delivery drivers over employee-contractor classification had reached a $39.5 million settlement. In that case, DoorDash sought to dismiss the claim based on the arbitration clause. However, in the federal arbitration case, DoorDash sought to refer back to the class action to stop the process. The judge rejected these arguments as unacceptable “hypocrisy.”

As many companies enter the “gig economy” space, there are a number of concerns to keep in mind, including the use of contractor status and arbitration clauses. A business law attorney may help companies to address contract disputes and manage potential litigation.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.

LI H.

I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.

G.L.

Read All