Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

How does copyright law apply to parody and satire?

It is common for some parties to use the text, pictures or logos of a California company while claiming that their depiction is intended to be humorous and thus perfectly legal. However, that might not always be the case, so if you find your IP being used by another party in this manner, you should understand how copyright law looks at works that are considered parodies and satires to see if you have a case.

According to the American Bar Association, the Supreme Court has validated the use of parody because it provides a form of commentary on an earlier work, and by doing so creates a new work. This is considered a “transformative” work which fair use allows for. Basically, a parody that samples another work and creates a transformative work is likely to be held as legally permissible under fair use. The more transformative the work is, the more probable it is that a judge will not have a problem with it.

However, the use of intellectual property in a work of satire is often another matter. In the 1994 Supreme Court case Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., the court drew a distinction between parody and satire, explaining that parody samples and copies another work to produce commentary, but satire takes another person or party’s work and uses it to criticize a different subject. Since the court does not see this as a transformative work, an act of satire requires justification, such as the permission of the copyright holder, for the IP to be used in satire.

Still, the court did not suggest that all works of satire are not permissible under fair use, nor are all parodies necessarily legal. A satirical work that samples another IP could be justified if consumers were not likely to be fooled into thinking the satire is a commercial substitute for the original IP. Satirical works might also be permitted if they sample very little of the original IP. Basically, any work of parody and satire is going to be evaluated by the requirements of copyright law and the justifications of fair use.

If you own an IP and find another party using it under the justification of parody and satire, be aware that you have recourse if you believe the other party is not using it in a legitimate manner under fair use. Check out this page on our website to learn more about the kinds of intellectual property protection cases handled by the Wang IP Law Group. Do not consider this article itself as legal advice. Only read it for your educational benefit.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.


I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.


Read All