Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

California’s Ban on Non-Competes

In terms of geographic size and economic sway, California is the sixth largest economy in the world, surpassing France in 2016. As a result, California’s employment laws are strict, and lawmakers allow for little exceptions. One example of such a law is the state’s stance against non-compete agreements. Whether you are an employer or employee in California, it is important that you understand the state’s ban on non-competes and how it pertains to you.

According to HuffPost, California business owners attempt to skirt non-compete laws all the time. They attempt to do this in several ways. One such way is by claiming California laws should not apply to them because the business has headquarters in a state that allows non-competes. The courts routinely object this analysis. The courts also object the “choice of law” provision, which allows companies with multiple locations to choose which laws apply to them.

Some employers may also adopt a “Garden Leave” policy. These policies often require seasoned and executive workers to give notice far in advance of their resignation. “Far in advance” means 90 to 180 days. During this 90- to 180-day period, employees may not return to work. However, employers will pay them at 100 percent of their salary, including benefits, until the end of the notice period. California courts have determined that such provisions are unenforceable.

Another tactic California courts have rejected is the “inevitable disclosure doctrine.” This means that an employer cannot enforce non-competes on the grounds that an employee plans to take a job with a competitor in which prior confidences are necessary to the employee’s performance in the new role.

That said, non-competes are enforceable before the termination of the employer-employee relationship. A company may legally prevent employees from taking on a second job during the term of their employment, especially when the second job involves working for a competitor.

Another exception is that the seller of a business may not turn around and start a new business that competes with the business he or she just sold. This would reduce the value of the old business and therefore deprive the buyer of the benefits of the deal. For the same reasons, members of an LLC may not leave a business to go start a new, similar business. For more information regarding your rights as a California employer or employee, contact Wang Intellectual Property.

The information in this post is meant to educate. It should not be used as legal advice.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.


I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.


Read All