Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

Washington Post lists ‘Stupidest Patents of 2017’

A year-end wrap-up of patent highlights in a major newspaper focused on a trend toward what it called “stupid patents.”

There is an actual endowed position at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, dedicated toward identifying and exposing stupid patents. The position is called the Mark Cuban Chair to Eliminate Stupid Patents, funded by tech investor Mark Cuban.

When is a patent ‘stupid’?

A stupid patent, the Washington Post article explained, is something worse than a frivolous invention. It is a patent that should not have been granted in the first place, and that causes harm in the marketplace.

The designation includes legitimizing patent trolling – when patents are obtained solely for licensing or litigation, not for the actual production and sale of goods or services.

The Consumer Technology Association estimates that patent trolling sucks $1.5 billion from the U.S. economy every single week.

Software leads the way

Software patents are the leading category in the stupid patents list. They cite a patent granted to CBS Interactive for a program allowing users to review and annotate song lyrics.

Another patent went to a program that scans Uber and Lyft traffic and finds taxis that are free and places a call to the taxi dispatch system.

Hewlett-Packard obtained a patent for a program that reminds you of upcoming calendar items – never mind that nearly identical programs have been on the market for years.

EFF’s point of view

Why does the EFF frown on these patents? Because they are redundant – software properties have long been shielded by copyright and often trade secret law. And because, all too often, they often involve very large companies claiming patents to keep smaller companies at bay. Very often, the result is that smaller companies must litigate their patents – if they can afford to.

The EFF’s stand on so-called stupid patents is controversial. Many companies and product developers feel that labeling product ideas as stupid is a disservice to them. But EFF argues that Congress has ignored the need to tilt patent law back toward the inventers of real products. Even the courts, which occasionally rule in favor of “the little guy,” have not done enough.

The article lists the stupid patents for this year. Tune in next December to see what 2018 introduces.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.

LI H.

I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.

G.L.

Read All