Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

PRIOR ART VIA ALGORITHM: ARTIST TAKES AIM AT “PATENT TROLLS”

programming-942487_1920-300x212.jpg

In an effort to demonstrate the potential for abuse in the United States patent filing system, artist and engineer Alexander Reben is fighting against “patent trolls” with his project, “All Prior Art.” Reben’s project involves using an algorithm that pieces together random phrases and sentences from the entire U.S. patent database to generate “prior art.” If there is any known evidence that an idea already exists, it is considered “prior art.” 

Under federal law, concepts deemed to be prior art may not be patented. As long as there is evidence that someone made or described something similar in the past, the idea may be considered to be prior art, even if the evidence will face stricter scrutiny in actual litigation. Reben’s work nonetheless serves as a statement against the loopholes in a system that allows patent trolls to obtain and “defend” intellectual property rights for ideas that they never planned on executing.

Prior Art Goes Public

To date, Reben has posted over 4.2 million computer-generated ideas on the internet as a public collection of prior art, licensed under Creative Commons. Although most of Reben’s ideas are meaningless, the process is so easy that it costs little to nothing to increase the probability of producing valid prior art. For example, one of Reben’s more sensical “ideas” is for an ad display that reads as follows: “A merchandising display system having a molded shelf unit containing a plurality of shelves and/or a pegboard for holding goods, and one or more graphic panels for displaying advertising or other information is disclosed.”

By combining different elements featured in existing patents, Reben’s algorithm creates seemingly “original” ideas that could theoretically be used against legitimate inventors – something that patent trolls often do, but for an ulterior purpose. While Reben’s goal is not to produce all possible prior art, it certainly starts a greater conversation about the need to prevent “trolls” from obtaining rights in the first place.

Who Are Patent Trolls?

Patent trolls include people or organizations that either file frivolous patents or buy them from others for the sole purpose of obtaining the right to litigate. They then track down potential patent infringers, or people whom they suspect will violate their patented ideas, and send out pre-litigation settlement letters in bulk. Patent trolls make their money by threatening to sue for the maximum amount under the law, but ultimately offering a settlement deal for much less. This way, recipients opt to pay the fee and move on to avoid the high cost of litigation.

For Reben, patent trolls undermine the purpose of intellectual property rights, which are meant to incentivize and reward innovation. While most patent holders intend to execute their ideas, patent trolls do not attempt to create or invent anything. Instead, they file or buy a large volume of patents for the purpose of pursuing litigation. Additionally, their schemes are made easier because of what is known as the “American Rule,” which is the general rule in the United States that each party will pay their own attorney’s fees. Conversely, the “English Rule” requires the losing party to pay both parties’ fees. As a result, patent trolls target individuals or small companies that are less likely to be able to finance a lawsuit, and more likely to settle for a lesser amount.

The Supreme Court Weighs In

For those targeted by patent trolls that choose to defend themselves, the U.S. Supreme Court has already taken steps to make sure that patent trolls are held responsible for bringing frivolous lawsuits. In Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. (2014), the world’s largest maker of exercise equipment, ICON, threatened to sue a small manufacturer, Octane, for patent infringement regarding elliptical trainers.

After obtaining a summary judgment in their favor, Octane moved for attorney’s fees but were denied by the District Court. The High Court later reversed this decision and awarded fees to Octane on the grounds that if a patent lawsuit is deemed frivolous, fee shifting is appropriate. In other words, if a lawsuit is comprised of baseless claims, a Judge can use his or her discretion to award attorney’s fees to the winning party.

Moving Forward

Although the Octane court’s ruling punishes parties who pursue frivolous litigation, the decision only benefits those that actually reach a final judgment in court. Since attorney’s fees are awarded after litigation concludes, potential defendants still have to front the costs of litigation at the onset. Conversely, Reben’s algorithm aims to crowd out opportunities for patent trolls to obtain rights for the purpose of intimidating legitimate inventors. While Reben’s project does not exactly solve the problem of patent trolls, he hopes that his project will call attention to the flaws in the U.S. patent filing system that has allowed patent trolls to succeed.

For more information regarding Patent Law and other Intellectual Property-related matters, please visit our website at www.TheWangIPLaw.com.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.

LI H.

I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.

G.L.

Read All