Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

U.S. GOVERNMENT URGES GLOBAL ENFORCEMENT OF IP LAWS

The Office of United States Trade Representative (USTR) released the 2015 Special 301 Report. The report is the annual review of intellectual property rights protection and enforcement within the United States and in countries that participate in trade with the United. The report is a reflection of the United States’ efforts to maintain effective intellectual property rights.

internationallaw-300x239.jpg

The report highlighted the inadequate efforts of foreign countries such as China and India. The repot further accused these countries of misappropriating trade secrets, which puts U.S. intellectual property rights holder’s at a significant disadvantage.

The Watch List

The Special 301 subcommittee reviewed 72 U.S. trade partners and focused on assessing their intellectual property enforcement, as well as other related market areas affecting intellectual property. Their assessment identified whether a particular trading partner should be named as a priority foreign country and whether it should be placed on the regular Watch List or on the Priority Watch List.

Countries named on the Priority Watch List include Algeria, Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Indonesia, Kuwait, Pakistan, Russia Thailand, Venezuela, India, Ukraine, and China. Countries on the Priority Watch List are the countries in which the United States is particularly concerned about regarding the enforcement of intellectual property rights. These countries have exhibited failure to stop knockoff products such as pharmaceuticals, software and digital media.

There is also a trend in which the countries on the Priority Watch List fail to provide penalties for copyright and trademark infringement. Although in some countries, investigation and prosecution does take place, the imposed penalties are not enough to make infringers refrain from committing the same crime again.

When there are no consequences for violating intellectual property rights, infringers will continue to abuse laws and fail to give credit to the appropriate parties. Consumers suffer from purchasing knock-off products that are of lower quality. Intellectual property rights holders also suffer because their ideas are exploited for profit.

Intellectual Property Theft

China is responsible for up to 80% of the U.S. intellectual property theft. However, it has been noted in the report that there is a positive development towards the protection of intellectual property rights in China. The Chinese government has issued documents stating their high level commitment to enforcing intellectual property rights. The Chinese government will also allow industry entrepreneurs to have more said in the policy development of intellectual property protection.

The U.S. has encouraged China to engage with foreign governments and stakeholders to make sure that the regulatory intellectual property reforms are articulated properly and clearly. There has been an effort to make a bilateral cooperation. The U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) and the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED) are two of the most significant bilateral annual trade engagements between the United States and China.

Reforming Foreign Intellectual Property Policies

The USTR plans to continue to engage in trade with the listed trading partners. They will use the trade relationship to conduct extensive discussions regarding trade regimes and encourage the countries to reevaluate their enforcement on intellectual property. The USTR hopes that using trade as a bargaining tool will be effective in improving intellectual property protection in foreign countries.

The USTR plans to work closely with the governments of the countries on the Priority Watch List to address more concerns regarding the infringement of intellectual property rights.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.

LI H.

I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.

G.L.

Read All