Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

THE HIGH COURT OVERTURNS PRIVATE COPYING EXCEPTION LAW

itunesmusic

Private copying refers to when consumers pay for copyrighted material in one format and shifts the format from one medium to another. Nowadays, ripping music from a CD and converting the audio files into other forms is common practice. Consumers assume that because they already paid for the copyright material, they are allowed to make other copies for personal use. In the United Kingdom, the practice of private copying was illegal until October 2014 when the British Government introduced a private copying exception.

Private Copying Exception

The private copying exception allowed consumers of copyright material to make copies for their personal benefit. For example, ripping music from a CD to MP3 or burning a CD was made legal due to the exception. However, this change was short lived as various UK music groups argued over the financial losses caused by the exception. Copyright owners feared that by allowing consumers to make copies of music for personal use, they would suffer a loss of income. Many major music industry stakeholders in the UK, including the British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors, and the Musicians Union, applied for a Judicial Review of the government decision.

The High Court of Justice – which acts as the Supreme Court of Britain – overturned the copyright exception on July 17th. As a result, all acts of private copying in the UK are now considered as infringement. The IPO explicitly stated that copying a CD to an MP3 player would not be permitted and is considered infringement. The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) released a statement explaining, “It is now unlawful to make private copies of copyright works you own, without permission from the copyright holder-this includes format shifting from one medium to another.” The copyright exception was overturned to protect the interests of copyright holders.

The High Court decided that private copying had too many consequences for copyright owners and therefore the exception was unlawful. The UK Government is not happy with the decision of the High Court and is deciding whether or not to it will propose other copyright exception laws in the future.

Legal Implications

The overturning of the private copying exception will cause a huge problem to Apple. The company promotes their CD ripping functionality as one of the main benefits of the music application, iTunes. Apple could potentially face significant claims for damages from copyright holders.

The law bans more than just CD to MP3 conversions. Consumers are no longer allowed to convert any type of copyrighted materials in any medium. Simply storing a backup copy of copyrighted files in a hard drive is also considered illegal. Even though it is unlikely, one could be taken to court for backing up the music from their iTunes.

What does this mean for consumers? If a consumer buys a song from iTunes, they cannot burn the song onto a CD, or transfer the music from a computer to a phone. Under the new law, consumers must purchase different formats of an artist’s work to be able to listen to music in different mediums. In the event that a person’s computer crashes, the only option to recover lost music or other copyrighted material is to repurchase them.

Copyright holders have suggested allowing private copying in exchange for placing a tax on blank CDs and hard drives. Although it is considered to be against the law, the UK has never come across a case in which a copyright owner prosecuted individuals for changing the format of their music, or backing up their files for personal use.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.

LI H.

I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.

G.L.

Read All