Enriching Life Through Innovative Ideas SM

GREY MARKET GOODS

0_0_640_0_70__Features_globe-boxes-300x246.jpg

It is common knowledge that U.S. customers are willing to pay a higher price for products from valued, well-known brands. There is a price disparity between the amount of money U.S. consumers are willing to spend versus the amount foreign customers are willing to spend on the same product. These higher prices create a good domestic market for products, but it also incentivizes the selling of items referred to as grey market goods. Grey market goods or parallel market goods, are genuine and non-counterfeit trademarked products that are imported from one market and sold in another market – which the manufacturer did not intend for sale – at a below market price.

Parallel imports can range from luxury products such as handbags to utilitarian items such as prescription drugs. Instead of buying products from a manufacturer in the United States and selling them at the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP), dealers and resellers will import grey market goods so they may retain a higher profit. The seller imports items buy items manufactured in a foreign country at a lower price, and sell it at a high price in the United States. Though the grey market does benefit resellers by cutting costs, it also creates problems for domestic manufacturers, such as loss of profits.

International Trade Commission

Regulating the sale of grey goods to the minimum is difficult but possible. Taking aggressive action against resellers and agents is an option. Brand owners with U.S. trademarks have a legal advantage and can prosecute the distributor of grey goods in court. Grey market imports may be nearly identical to the material being infringed on, so grey market trademark infringement actions are fairly difficult to win in district court.
However, the most efficient way to remedy parallel imports is to go through the U.S. International Trade Commission. The Commission has broad injunctive power to stop products at the border, and can provide powerful injunctive relief against imports that infringe patents, trademarks, and copyrights. The Commission is well known for its time efficient manner in settling cases.

The ITC is preferred over federal court because in federal district court, the litigation of a case may not go to trial until years after it’s filed. When the party accused of distribution of grey goods does not respond within 20 days, a default can be sought. A default judgment is a judgment made when one party in the case fails to respond to summons or appear in court. Default is the most common form of response when dealing with grey market litigation. The selling of grey goods can be detrimental to the profits of a company and other trademark holders; therefore it is essential to stop the parallel market as soon as possible. The ITC is an under-utilized resource that can provide quick relief for trademark holders when their rights are infringed upon by the selling of grey goods.

Regulating Grey Goods

Section 337 of the Tariff act of 1930 prohibits importation of goods that infringe a common law trademark. The owner of the trademark must establish that the grey market goods are materially different from the products offered by the trademark owner and prove that the goods are not genuine. Material differences can be based on anything from physical differences to different warranty. Differences could even be the language of warning stickers on the product. There should be proof that there is a likelihood of confusion for a consumer due to the similar material.

Clothing is a widely distributed grey good. For example, a large portion of profits made by Abercrombie & Fitch comes from buyers who buy an enormous amount of clothing in the United States to resell in China at a higher price. In response, the company enacted a policy of allowing each customer to buy only selling 20 items of clothing a day. The grey good market for clothing has become extremely prominent, and as a result, many retail companies have enacted policies to discourage the distribution of grey goods.
Intellectual property rights holders have the ability to control the distribution of their products, therefore grey goods is a violation of the law. Although grey goods may be a good option to those who want to save money, they come at the expense of another individual’s intellectual property rights.

FindLaw Network

What Our Clients Say

Starting a new business can be a bit scary. Aside from worries of failure, there’s also the hassle of making sure all legal paperwork are properly filed. I reached out to Mr. Wang (Tommy) because of his excellent reviews and reputation and I am so glad I did. He was thorough and meticulous in answering all of my concerns and took time to find out special laws and policies regarding the kind of business I am starting. I could focus on the daily practical side of starting my new office without worry because I felt Tommy was reliable and took my case seriously. My business is opened and it’s all been a smooth start because of Tommy’s help. I have plans to start another business venture in the next few years and I already know I’ll be coming back to Wang IP Law.

The Shindig W.

I came to Tommy for help reviewing a licensing agreement I had secured with a well-known manufacturer. Tommy made sure I understood all the details in the contract and he negotiated with the company to improve my side of the deal. I mentioned to Tommy at my first consultation that we were looking to expand throughout the US and were investing a lot of money to make a big entrance into the market. I did not think I would have my store open so soon but Tommy also has connections with the local area and realtors to help me secure the location for my first store in the Los Angeles area. Tommy works a lot with the local businesses and he understands how to transition from the Asian market to US market. Within 8 months my store was open for business and fully operating. I must recommend Tommy to any business owners looking for help with contracts and improving their side of the deal. Tommy has the knowledge and experience to make sure there is a smooth process to open for business here, and make sure that your company is set up for success.

LI H.

I think Tommy and his team by far considered the best people to work with in my 16 business years. Beside quick responses to all my inquiries, they also done things right and providing very professional solutions. I’m highly recommending Tommy and his firm to all business owners.

Calvin C.

I have been working on my Utility Patent for almost 4 years. I have hired and fired two very reputable IP firms because with all their expertise and reputation for being some of the top firms in IP Law, I felt a lack of connection and care in my product, time and financial investment. Then I found Tommy and his team. Tommy does not waste time. He and his team are professional and extremely thorough. After 4 years, I finally found a legal team that I felt spent the time to really understand the components of my utility patent. Tommy also very mindful of cost and how and where my money would be better spent. I really feel I am in great hands with Tommy and his team. They have been patient with my revisions. And most importantly, they made me feel that they fully understood the importance this patent is to me. It has been a great and comforting pleasure working with Tommy.

G.L.

Read All